Free Download

Call for Blog Articles

Want to share your experiences, advice, or ideas with the GrammarPhile community? Do you have grammar, punctuation, editing questions you'd like answered? Submit guest post ideas or questions to conni@proofreadnow.com.

The GrammarPhile Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Why You Should Never Proofread Your Own Work!

  | Share on Twitter Twitter | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Share on LinkedIn LinkedIn |  Share On Technorati Technorati | Submit to Reddit reddit 

As a former journalist/production editor for a small company on a limited budget (thus the dual role), I can't emphasize enough the importance of not proofing your own material; trust me on this. Ask a colleague to review your material. If you don't have a colleague, ask a friend. If you don't have any friends, ask your six-year-old who just learned how to read "Dick and Jane." Anyone but you will do!

I've always prided myself in being a good writer and editor and proofreader. But I can't be all three on my own work—believe me, I've tried. I-N-S-A-N-I-T-Y.

For example, I once volunteered to produce my church's newsletter while the secretary was on vacation. Even though I knew it was crazy for me to think I could fit this task into my already-busy schedule, my hand shot up into the air before I could stop it.

I kept putting the task off and putting the task off until the wee hours leading up to 5 p.m. on a Friday—the deadline for the completed newsletter to be handed over to the pastor, who would then Xerox it for Sunday distribution.

I remember being so stressed in those hours I spent pulling the newsletter together. My neck hurt. I felt a headache coming on. I took some Motrin. I made a pact with myself that I would start walking around with my hands in my pockets, so they would be the last ones in the air if a volunteer was needed.

I finished the newsletter and read over it two times to make sure I hadn't missed anything. Perfect! I was quite satisfied with my work and mentally patted myself on the back as I drove to the church office. I had pulled off yet another tight deadline—I was good!

I walked into the pastor's office and as I handed the newsletter to him, I glanced down at the first page and the main headline jumped out at me, almost mockingly:

Lent: Focus on Prayer and Medication

Ugh...The hand that had been mentally patting me on the back mentally thumped me on the head! The main headline should have read "Lent: Focus on Prayer and Meditation." Fortunately, the pastor...and that Sunday's congregation...had a sense of humor.

How could I have missed something so obvious? Because my mind-set was "I don't make mistakes." And you probably think the same way! If you want to test this out, just type something, anything, and focus your attention on crossing your T's and dotting your I's. Let no mistakes get by you. After you've proofread your material, hand it off to someone else and give them a red pen. I guarantee they'll find something.

However, in a pinch (such as finding yourself stranded on an island with no one to proof your document), READ THE DOCUMENT FROM END TO BEGINNING AT LEAST TWO TIMES. And even then there's no guarantee you'll catch everything. Your message in the bottle could read: "I'm on dessert island. Send kelp!"

Comments

I agree with the author, although as stated, sometimes this is unavoidable. I too have been in this unavoidable position as both writer and editor due to small company structure. Here's a GREAT tip though - especially if you're worried about spelling errors like the medication/meditation one above: In addition to reading over it at least twice, read it backwards slowly! It sounds silly, but it works (if you have the time).
Posted @ Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:00 AM by Asia Brandvold
That's precisely what she said in the last paragraph: "Read the document from END to BEGINNING at least two times." However, I'm wondering why she used "two times" two times, instead of "twice." Also, if she prides herself on being a "good writer and editor and proofreader," she must know that one of those "ands" should be replaced by a comma. Maybe the Motrin hadn't kicked in yet. Great advice and well written otherwise.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:18 AM by Greyhound
Perhaps one of those extra "ands" was just for emphasis.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:40 AM by Surlymama
Asia, if you're still there please accept my apology for what might have sounded like a cheap shot. No offense intended. 
 
Surlymama, you are 100 percent correct and I'm 100 percent an idiot.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:30 PM by greyhound
Oh, pshaw. You are not an idiot. If the additional "and" was an oversight, it was well worth pointing out. I was only being the devil's advocate, offering a reason for it based on personal style and conversational tone.  
 
 
 
In editing, there is no room for tender feelings. We'll stomp all over them just like we stomp on excessive use of exclamation points. ;>)
Posted @ Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:37 PM by Surlymama
Note to self: never blog or post on a site for editors. After an obligatory acknowledgement of whatever your point was, they'll turn on you and criticize you. Then again, iron sharpens iron and we all need editing, as this post points out both explicitly and implicitly! (And pride goes before destruction.) There. Have at it.
Posted @ Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:50 AM by Chauncey
I find it refreshing, Chauncey. It's so rare to see the written word not polluted with errors, especially online. I've never met anyone in real life who was a better, pickier copyeditor than I am, but I have a feeling there's plenty of you out there, just waiting to critique me (thanks, Greyhound). Hey maybe there's even a few fellow linguists out there too. I may be a grammar nerd, but this idea thrills me.
Posted @ Sunday, October 18, 2009 11:18 AM by Asia
Comments have been closed for this article.

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Follow Us