Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Call for Blog Articles

Want to share your experiences, advice, or ideas with the GrammarPhile community? Do you have grammar, punctuation, editing questions you'd like answered? Submit guest post ideas or questions to conni@proofreadnow.com.

Alltop. We're kind of a big deal.

Posts by category

The GrammarPhile Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Merriam Webster and OED Are Off the Chain!

  
  
  

In 2011 Merriam-Webster added more than 150 new words to the dictionary, including social media and bromance. And the Oxford English Dictionary added such phrases as light-bulb moment and environmentally unfriendly.

Do we really need authorities on language to define for us words and phrases that already exist but are just used in new combinations or in different ways? Are we not smart enough to figure out that social media refers to media that is used for social purposes? Will you ever feel the need to look up the meaning of the word bromance? Or do you hope that as current slang it will just go the way of words and phrases like whizzah and grody to the max?

Perhaps dictionaries feel the need to stay on top of trends in language to stay relevant. Perhaps the older we get the more we feel the need to go to an online dictionary to understand the language of the young’uns and pop culture.

I have to admit, after seeing the movie “Elf” years ago, ginormous has become part of my vocabulary and definitely provides punch that synonyms such as big and large do not. And when my stepdaughter said she wanted her hair to be volumptuous for her wedding, I laughed because I knew that wasn’t a word, but I knew exactly what she meant and thought that it should be—sure enough, go to urbandictionary.com and it is!

 

try-us-out-no-credit-card-neede

Comments

I would make a distinction between, on the one hand, evanescent figure-outable terms (there's one now) or terms from which, like "social media," the meaning can be extracted by looking up "social" and "media" and, on the other, a word like "bromance" that does not have a useful equivalent in English, that NOT everyone knows the meaning of (heads up: not quite yet is everyone on the planet under forty, American, and media-saturated), and that will therefore no doubt become permanent.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:22 by susan campbell
I think I have figured out why you do not list "It's vs. Its" on your blog. I am sure the interchange of these two words is one of the most common grammatical errors that you correct in clients' submittals. Is my assumption accurate?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:40 by Brenda Templeton
Now that I am pondering this, I wonder...does the publisher of a dictionary ever release lists of words it is *removing* from its contents? Or are they just quietly deleted?
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 11:52 by Marie
Susan, I think that the Internet, cell phones, and social media make new terms more universal than ever before, but I have to agree age is definitely a factor with a lot of new terms!  
 
 
 
Brenda I don't have the empirical evidence for PNCI, but I can tell you that in my 20+ years of experience that its/it's is a very common mistake! 
 
 
 
Marie, I don't know if they post a list of removals . . . how sad that a word might no longer exist!
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:37 PM by Julie D
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics