Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Call for Blog Articles

Want to share your experiences, advice, or ideas with the GrammarPhile community? Do you have grammar, punctuation, editing questions you'd like answered? Submit guest post ideas or questions to conni@proofreadnow.com.

Alltop. We're kind of a big deal.

Posts by category

The GrammarPhile Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Numbers in Dialogue

  
  
  

jumbled numbers

Spell out numbers in dialogue unless they are excessively awkward.

"You owe me one hundred and fifty-five dollars," he said is preferable to "You owe me $155," he said. Numbers, and also the dollar sign and percent sign, somehow do not look right in dialogue, although we do accept them in quotations in newspaper accounts; newspapers do not follow this rule.

"The materials were $122.36, the labor comes to $88.50 plus $43 for overtime, and payoffs were $1,250 to the city and $10 to the doorman, giving us a grand total of $1,413.86," he said would be very tedious if all the sums were spelled out. They could be spelled out if the writer wants to stretch them out for effect, but they are easier to absorb as figures, and most readers would be much less put off by the figures than they would be by one hundred and twenty-two dollars and thirty-six cents. So figures are okay when spelled-out; numbers are unacceptably awkward.

Exception
The only general exception is years--they are always in figures in dialogue unless the writer wants them said in an unusual way: "It was in nineteen-ought-six," he said, "and long before anyone foresaw the ruckus that came in nineteen and fourteen."

Depending on the requirements of what they are writing, writers can decide to make any other exceptions they choose. "We're expecting the probe to be closest to Venus at exactly 2236 hours" and "Don't use this stimulant if the temperature is below 96.5 or above 101.5"could both written out without excessive awkwardness. However, if military time occurs constantly in the context of the first example and body temperature occurs constantly in that of the second, a writer may justifiably decide to use figures.

Comments

Did a semicolon sneak into your text accidentally in the sentence above the bold "Exception"?
Posted @ Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:36 by Sarah Abts
Sarah, Thank you for blogging. No, that semicolon is fine as is - it divides two somewhat connected sentences... more than a pause, less than a period. When using semicolons, just make sure each phrase can stand on its own.
Posted @ Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:49 by Phil Jamieson
I seem to recall a bit of a controversy over whether to include "and" in a three digit number. Should it be one hundred and fifty-five dollars or one hundred fifty-five dollars? Should it be one thousand and one hundred and fifty-five dollars?
Posted @ Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:36 by Paula Mochel
I'm struggling with the same sentence Sarah mentioned. As one sentence it makes sense: "figures are okay when spelled-out numbers are...awkward." But as two separate thoughts "figures are okay when spelled-out" and "numbers are...awkward" I'm left feeling confused. Forgive me for asking you to answer the same question twice, but are you sure you didn't mean that to be one thought?
Posted @ Tuesday, September 06, 2011 4:37 PM by Michele Partain
Thanks for blogging! Paula, yes, do not use "and" for 3-digit numbers. I cannot find it in CMS this moment, but I think speaks to that. AP might also. But in the thousaand-version, use "and" only once. 
 
 
 
Michele, yes, we stand by the sentence. It is a sort-of see-saw sentence - one thought is balanced by the other, so it would not be as good as two completely separate sentences. And as one sentence without intervening punctuation, it would be horrible!
Posted @ Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:08 by Phil Jamieson
I am commenting on the last sentence in the first paragraph. I think I would have put a period after accounts and started a new sentence with newspapers. It seems awkward to me to have the semi-colon there.
Posted @ Friday, September 23, 2011 1:37 by Jeanette Paisley
Dear Jeanette, 
 
 
 
Thank you for blogging. You can put a period there if you like. It works as is, with the blurb about newspapers being a related afterthought. But it can stand separately too. Had we been proofing it, editor A may have left it while editor B may have changed it. The author would go with his or her preference in the end. Thanks again! 
 
PJ
Posted @ Monday, September 26, 2011 8:59 by Phil Jamieson
The actual problem with the last sentence of the second paragraph is that "spelled out" shouldn't be hyphenated.
Posted @ Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:24 PM by Carrie
Yes, Carrie, that's why you are a proofreader. That hyphenate is incorrect. We will fix it. But then people will not know what your post is about!
Posted @ Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:08 by Phil Jamieson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics