GrammarPhile Blog

Editing -- It's Not Just to Correct Spelling Errors!

Posted by Phil Jamieson   Jul 12, 2011 5:30:00 AM


We're often asked by our customers to tidy up their writing and enhance their style. One client put it this way: "Will you please make this letter sing?" His document was actually a proposal in letter form. Well, our editors made it 'sing,' and the client got the deal! Editing is not simply a matter of correcting spelling errors. Indeed, there are wordings that to the casual observer and author may seem fine, but to the critical-minded addressee can seem outlandish, verbose, or just plain wrong. These errors convey subtle, yet important, messages, and quietly leave the impression of sloppiness or inexperience. Not everyone will notice, but those who do are probably the people you are trying to reach and influence. They are people who can make or break your proposal.

For example, when we see the phrase the reason is because, our alarms sound. We take action. Here's why:

Anyone answering the question For what reason? would naturally say For the reason that . . ., not For the reason because . . . But when reason is the subject of a declaration, with or without a verb wedged between reason and what follows, there is a strong temptation to substitute because for that. The substitution, besides being a breach of idiom, is an obvious redundancy: because = for the reason that. Therefore The reason is because means The reason is for the reason that. Typical instances:
  • The reason for nominating him is because (that) he commands the pacifist vote.
  • The reason for this return is not because of feeding problems. (omit because of)
  • A psychiatrist suggested that the reason Hamlet could not kill his uncle was because he himself had wanted to kill his father. (omit the reason and was)
  • One of the reasons the Simplestix party is in trouble today is because ... we have allowed people to criticize our policies and we have not stood up and answered effectively. (replace because with that)

Substituting that for because will generally restore grammar; but, as some of the examples show, it may result in a wordiness that requires attention. He was nominated because and He was nominated for the reason that are correct equivalents, but the second is labored.

Source: Modern American Usage, edited by Jacques Barzun, 1966. (Despite the book's title, our tip applies to UK and Canadian English as well as American English.)

Read More

Topics: editing, use of because, spelling

Vocabulary Test: ConGRADulations?

Posted by Phil Jamieson   Jun 28, 2011 5:30:00 AM

 

By this time in June, many people have left their schools for good, after years of study. Did people at Yale, for example, "graduate Yale" or did they "graduate from Yale"? Or did Yale "graduate them"? And if one is attending a "commencement" ceremony, why is it called that? Isn't the ceremony all about the end of their college careers? What are they commencing, anyway? Take our test, and see if you graduate with highest honors.

Read More

Topics: word test, vocabulary test

Evie eat it my muffin!

Posted by Conni Eversull   Jun 21, 2011 5:30:00 AM

You’re probably thinking “What does that title mean and what does it have to do with grammar and punctuation and writing?” Well, today, I thought I’d take a little break from our standard posts. I don’t know about you, but with summer almost here I know I’m starting to look forward to long hot summer days and some vacation time. So, here’s a post from a lighter side.

Read More

Topics: sentences, documents, punctuation, grammar, pronouns, verbs

Double Negatives

Posted by Phil Jamieson   Jun 14, 2011 5:30:00 AM

True or False: Never Use Two Negatives in the Same Sentence
The logic behind this rule is that two negatives in the same construction cancel each other out. When we say, "We never did nothing," what we are saying, in effect, is that "At no time did we ever do nothing," which means that at all times we did something. Something like that, anyway.

Read More

Topics: double negatives, double negative, negatives

Not sure how to form plurals? Read this!

Posted by Phil Jamieson   Jun 7, 2011 5:30:00 AM



The zookeeper wanted to order four buffaloes for his new display, but he didn't know how to pluralize buffalo.

Read More

Topics: pluralize, plural

More Reader Questions!

Posted by Conni Eversull   May 24, 2011 5:30:00 AM

Our mailbag has been full this past week. Here are more questions from readers and answers from our Grammar Experts!

Read More

Topics: quotation marks, plural, singular

Grammar Questions

Posted by Conni Eversull   May 17, 2011 5:30:00 AM

Read More

Topics: quotation marks, past tense, present perfect tense, first-person pronouns

The Internet, Email, and E-Books

Posted by Conni Eversull   May 10, 2011 5:30:00 AM

********************************************
The following is a guest post by Alexis Bonari.
********************************************

Read More

Topics: hyphenation, capitalization

Commas - When to Use Them or Omit Them

Posted by Phil Jamieson   May 3, 2011 5:30:00 AM

The comma, aside from its technical uses in mathematical, bibliographical, and other contexts, indicates the smallest break in sentence structure. It denotes a slight pause. Effective use of the comma involves good judgment, with ease of reading the end in view. Here are some guidelines.

Read More

Better Writing: Proper Use of Possessive Form

Posted by Phil Jamieson   Apr 26, 2011 5:30:00 AM

Here are some examples of when the letter s is added to a possessive form.

Nouns plural in form, singular in meaning. When the singular form of a noun ending in s looks like a plural and the plural form is the same as the singular, the possessive of both singular and plural is formed by the addition of an apostrophe only. If ambiguity threatens, use of to avoid the possessive.

Read More

Topics: possessive form, possessives

Subscribe to Email Updates

Sign up for our emails!

Sign Up

Search Our Blog

Recent Posts

Posts by Topic

see all